Trump’s recent escalation against media outlets, including his September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage, has reinforced his established pattern of public rebukes toward journalists and political opponents. On September 18 he directly told Bloomberg correspondent Catherine Lucey she was “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange defending the restrictions, continuing a series of pointed remarks aimed at female reporters and outlets in recent weeks. With the September 30 resolution window approaching, traders weigh the likelihood of further named attacks on media figures or rivals based on Trump’s documented record of social media posts, rally comments, and press interactions that meet the market’s criteria for personal or professional insults.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว$137,282 ปริมาณ
Sep 30, 2026
Mark Carney
75%
Jon Ossoff
74%
Tucker Carlson
66%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
62%
Alex Jones
50%
Zohran Mamdani
30%
Elon Musk
41%
Letitia James
39%
Friedrich Merz
27%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
34%
Andy Burnham
30%
Kathy Hochul
39%
Candace Owens
31%
Emmanuel Macron
14%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Jerome Powell
9%
Norah O'Donnell
7%
Stephen Colbert
28%
Pope Leo XIV
6%
Kevin Warsh
6%
Melania Trump
5%
J.D. Vance
4%
Xi Jinping
4%
Mohammed bin Salman
4%
Vladimir Putin
2%
Karoline Leavitt
2%
Pam Bondi
10%
Megyn Kelly
42%
Jimmy Kimmel
54%
Ilhan Omar
59%
Hillary Clinton
55%
Elizabeth Warren
51%
Adam Schiff
49%
$137,282 ปริมาณ
Mark Carney
$4,997 ปริมาณ
75%
Jon Ossoff
$123 ปริมาณ
74%
Tucker Carlson
$3,227 ปริมาณ
66%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$249 ปริมาณ
62%
Alex Jones
$204 ปริมาณ
50%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,510 ปริมาณ
30%
Elon Musk
$170 ปริมาณ
41%
Letitia James
$747 ปริมาณ
39%
Friedrich Merz
$2,496 ปริมาณ
27%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,525 ปริมาณ
34%
Andy Burnham
$3,715 ปริมาณ
30%
Kathy Hochul
$2,198 ปริมาณ
39%
Candace Owens
$3,097 ปริมาณ
31%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,523 ปริมาณ
14%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,642 ปริมาณ
10%
Jerome Powell
$2,136 ปริมาณ
9%
Norah O'Donnell
$72 ปริมาณ
7%
Stephen Colbert
$321 ปริมาณ
28%
Pope Leo XIV
$1,386 ปริมาณ
6%
Kevin Warsh
$77,427 ปริมาณ
6%
Melania Trump
$101 ปริมาณ
5%
J.D. Vance
$1,542 ปริมาณ
4%
Xi Jinping
$2,169 ปริมาณ
4%
Mohammed bin Salman
$440 ปริมาณ
4%
Vladimir Putin
$2,695 ปริมาณ
2%
Karoline Leavitt
$300 ปริมาณ
2%
Pam Bondi
$263 ปริมาณ
10%
Megyn Kelly
$407 ปริมาณ
42%
Jimmy Kimmel
$923 ปริมาณ
54%
Ilhan Omar
$419 ปริมาณ
59%
Hillary Clinton
$1,985 ปริมาณ
55%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 ปริมาณ
51%
Adam Schiff
$61 ปริมาณ
49%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s recent escalation against media outlets, including his September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage, has reinforced his established pattern of public rebukes toward journalists and political opponents. On September 18 he directly told Bloomberg correspondent Catherine Lucey she was “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange defending the restrictions, continuing a series of pointed remarks aimed at female reporters and outlets in recent weeks. With the September 30 resolution window approaching, traders weigh the likelihood of further named attacks on media figures or rivals based on Trump’s documented record of social media posts, rally comments, and press interactions that meet the market’s criteria for personal or professional insults.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$137,282วันสิ้นสุด
Sep 30, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETผู้ตัดสินผล
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s recent escalation against media outlets, including his September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage, has reinforced his established pattern of public rebukes toward journalists and political opponents. On September 18 he directly told Bloomberg correspondent Catherine Lucey she was “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange defending the restrictions, continuing a series of pointed remarks aimed at female reporters and outlets in recent weeks. With the September 30 resolution window approaching, traders weigh the likelihood of further named attacks on media figures or rivals based on Trump’s documented record of social media posts, rally comments, and press interactions that meet the market’s criteria for personal or professional insults.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$137,282วันสิ้นสุด
Sep 30, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETผู้ตัดสินผล
0x65070BE91...Trump’s recent escalation against media outlets, including his September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage, has reinforced his established pattern of public rebukes toward journalists and political opponents. On September 18 he directly told Bloomberg correspondent Catherine Lucey she was “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange defending the restrictions, continuing a series of pointed remarks aimed at female reporters and outlets in recent weeks. With the September 30 resolution window approaching, traders weigh the likelihood of further named attacks on media figures or rivals based on Trump’s documented record of social media posts, rally comments, and press interactions that meet the market’s criteria for personal or professional insults.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
คำถามที่พบบ่อย