President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日$52,183 Vol.
2026/09/30
アブドゥル・エル＝サイエド
90%
キャシー・ホークル
70%
マーク・カーニー
83%
マーシャリー・テイラー・グリーン
60%
タッカー・カールソン
65%
ノラ・オドネル
50%
アレクサンドリア・オカシオ＝コルテス
49%
レティシア・ジェームズ
43%
ヒラリー・クリントン
60%
アンディ・バーナム
32%
ゾーラン・マムダニ
33%
フリードリヒ・メルツ
27%
イーロン・マスク
26%
キャンディス・オーウェンズ
24%
ジェローム・パウエル
20%
エマニュエル・マクロン
16%
アレックス・ジョーンズ
25%
ベンヤミン・ネタニヤフ
10%
ケビン・ウォーシュ
8%
ムハンマド・ビン・サルマン
6%
メラニア・トランプ
11%
パム・ボンディ
6%
レオ14世教皇
5%
習近平
4%
ウラジーミル・プーチン
4%
J.D.ヴァンス
20%
カロリン・レビット
3%
メーガン・ケリー
45%
J.B.プリツカー
55%
ジョン・オソフ
56%
エリザベス・ウォーレン
61%
アダム・シフ
55%
スティーヴン・コルベア
48%
イルハン・オマル
68%
ジミー・キンメル
57%
$52,183 Vol.
アブドゥル・エル＝サイエド
$1,489 Vol.
90%
キャシー・ホークル
$1,972 Vol.
70%
マーク・カーニー
$3,053 Vol.
83%
マーシャリー・テイラー・グリーン
$1,505 Vol.
60%
タッカー・カールソン
$2,343 Vol.
65%
ノラ・オドネル
$52 Vol.
50%
アレクサンドリア・オカシオ＝コルテス
$140 Vol.
49%
レティシア・ジェームズ
$484 Vol.
43%
ヒラリー・クリントン
$1,902 Vol.
60%
アンディ・バーナム
$2,764 Vol.
32%
ゾーラン・マムダニ
$2,469 Vol.
33%
フリードリヒ・メルツ
$1,856 Vol.
27%
イーロン・マスク
$63 Vol.
26%
キャンディス・オーウェンズ
$2,014 Vol.
24%
ジェローム・パウエル
$1,394 Vol.
20%
エマニュエル・マクロン
$3,838 Vol.
16%
アレックス・ジョーンズ
$143 Vol.
25%
ベンヤミン・ネタニヤフ
$1,211 Vol.
10%
ケビン・ウォーシュ
$4,635 Vol.
8%
ムハンマド・ビン・サルマン
$408 Vol.
6%
メラニア・トランプ
$95 Vol.
11%
パム・ボンディ
$250 Vol.
6%
レオ14世教皇
$1,063 Vol.
5%
習近平
$445 Vol.
4%
ウラジーミル・プーチン
$2,249 Vol.
4%
J.D.ヴァンス
$1,500 Vol.
20%
カロリン・レビット
$272 Vol.
3%
メーガン・ケリー
$377 Vol.
45%
J.B.プリツカー
$264 Vol.
55%
ジョン・オソフ
$103 Vol.
56%
エリザベス・ウォーレン
$457 Vol.
61%
アダム・シフ
$61 Vol.
55%
スティーヴン・コルベア
$321 Vol.
48%
イルハン・オマル
$240 Vol.
68%
ジミー・キンメル
$879 Vol.
57%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
マーケット開始日： Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
音量
$52,183終了日
2026/09/30マーケット開始日
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETリゾルバー
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
音量
$52,183終了日
2026/09/30マーケット開始日
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETリゾルバー
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問