Trump's ongoing pattern of direct public attacks via Truth Social posts and rally remarks continues to shape expectations around potential targets by September 30. In early September, he described CNN correspondent Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and a "3rd rate" anchor following a panel discussion, then called New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman "Maggot Hagerman" and "unattractive both inside and out" over reporting on his schedule. He also targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a North Carolina event, urging her to "get the hell out of our country" and labeling her a "con." Additional exchanges with ABC News reporters during travel and press interactions have featured labels like "fake news" and personal dismissals. These incidents occur amid a schedule that includes Republican midterm events and foreign policy pressures, reflecting his established approach of responding to media or political criticism with personal language.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated$52,279 Vol.
Sep 30, 2026
Abdul El-Sayed
87%
Kathy Hochul
71%
Mark Carney
83%
Hillary Clinton
58%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
54%
Tucker Carlson
63%
Norah O'Donnell
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
49%
Letitia James
43%
Zohran Mamdani
32%
Andy Burnham
28%
Friedrich Merz
27%
Elon Musk
26%
Candace Owens
24%
Jerome Powell
20%
Emmanuel Macron
16%
Alex Jones
26%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Kevin Warsh
8%
Melania Trump
11%
Pam Bondi
6%
Mohammed bin Salman
5%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Xi Jinping
4%
Vladimir Putin
4%
J.D. Vance
20%
Karoline Leavitt
3%
Megyn Kelly
43%
J.B. Pritzker
55%
Jon Ossoff
51%
Elizabeth Warren
60%
Adam Schiff
50%
Stephen Colbert
48%
Ilhan Omar
50%
Jimmy Kimmel
57%
$52,279 Vol.
Abdul El-Sayed
$1,530 Vol.
87%
Kathy Hochul
$1,972 Vol.
71%
Mark Carney
$3,053 Vol.
83%
Hillary Clinton
$1,902 Vol.
58%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,505 Vol.
54%
Tucker Carlson
$2,343 Vol.
63%
Norah O'Donnell
$52 Vol.
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$140 Vol.
49%
Letitia James
$484 Vol.
43%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,469 Vol.
32%
Andy Burnham
$2,764 Vol.
28%
Friedrich Merz
$1,856 Vol.
27%
Elon Musk
$63 Vol.
26%
Candace Owens
$2,014 Vol.
24%
Jerome Powell
$1,394 Vol.
20%
Emmanuel Macron
$3,838 Vol.
16%
Alex Jones
$143 Vol.
26%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,211 Vol.
10%
Kevin Warsh
$4,635 Vol.
8%
Melania Trump
$95 Vol.
11%
Pam Bondi
$250 Vol.
6%
Mohammed bin Salman
$408 Vol.
5%
Pope Leo XIV
$1,063 Vol.
5%
Xi Jinping
$445 Vol.
4%
Vladimir Putin
$2,249 Vol.
4%
J.D. Vance
$1,500 Vol.
20%
Karoline Leavitt
$272 Vol.
3%
Megyn Kelly
$377 Vol.
43%
J.B. Pritzker
$264 Vol.
55%
Jon Ossoff
$103 Vol.
51%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Vol.
60%
Adam Schiff
$61 Vol.
50%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Vol.
48%
Ilhan Omar
$295 Vol.
50%
Jimmy Kimmel
$879 Vol.
57%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's ongoing pattern of direct public attacks via Truth Social posts and rally remarks continues to shape expectations around potential targets by September 30. In early September, he described CNN correspondent Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and a "3rd rate" anchor following a panel discussion, then called New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman "Maggot Hagerman" and "unattractive both inside and out" over reporting on his schedule. He also targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a North Carolina event, urging her to "get the hell out of our country" and labeling her a "con." Additional exchanges with ABC News reporters during travel and press interactions have featured labels like "fake news" and personal dismissals. These incidents occur amid a schedule that includes Republican midterm events and foreign policy pressures, reflecting his established approach of responding to media or political criticism with personal language.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Market Opened: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Volume
$52,279End Date
Sep 30, 2026Market Opened
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's ongoing pattern of direct public attacks via Truth Social posts and rally remarks continues to shape expectations around potential targets by September 30. In early September, he described CNN correspondent Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and a "3rd rate" anchor following a panel discussion, then called New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman "Maggot Hagerman" and "unattractive both inside and out" over reporting on his schedule. He also targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a North Carolina event, urging her to "get the hell out of our country" and labeling her a "con." Additional exchanges with ABC News reporters during travel and press interactions have featured labels like "fake news" and personal dismissals. These incidents occur amid a schedule that includes Republican midterm events and foreign policy pressures, reflecting his established approach of responding to media or political criticism with personal language.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$52,279End Date
Sep 30, 2026Market Opened
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trump's ongoing pattern of direct public attacks via Truth Social posts and rally remarks continues to shape expectations around potential targets by September 30. In early September, he described CNN correspondent Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and a "3rd rate" anchor following a panel discussion, then called New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman "Maggot Hagerman" and "unattractive both inside and out" over reporting on his schedule. He also targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a North Carolina event, urging her to "get the hell out of our country" and labeling her a "con." Additional exchanges with ABC News reporters during travel and press interactions have featured labels like "fake news" and personal dismissals. These incidents occur amid a schedule that includes Republican midterm events and foreign policy pressures, reflecting his established approach of responding to media or political criticism with personal language.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions