Trump's recent public statements have featured pointed criticisms of journalists and political figures, including Truth Social posts on September 9 attacking CNN's Kaitlan Collins as a "3rd rate anchor" and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman as "unattractive both inside and out" while dismissing their reporting. He separately targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a rally, urging her to "get the HELL out of our country" and labeling her a "con." These fit a documented pattern of remarks aimed at media outlets, female reporters, and opponents amid coverage of the ongoing U.S.-Iran military conflict, munitions issues, and Republican events. With the September 30 resolution window now under three weeks, trader focus centers on the frequency of Truth Social activity, scheduled rallies or conventions, and any escalation in disputes with press or lawmakers that could produce additional named attacks.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato$52,013 Vol.
30 set 2026
Abdul El-Sayed
89%
Kathy Hochul
70%
Mark Carney
83%
Hillary Clinton
61%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
57%
Tucker Carlson
67%
Norah O'Donnell
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
49%
Letitia James
43%
Andy Burnham
32%
Zohran Mamdani
33%
Friedrich Merz
27%
Elon Musk
26%
Candace Owens
23%
Jerome Powell
20%
Emmanuel Macron
15%
Alex Jones
26%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Kevin Warsh
8%
Melania Trump
11%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Pam Bondi
6%
Papa Leone XIV
5%
Xi Jinping
4%
Vladimir Putin
4%
J.D. Vance
21%
Karoline Leavitt
3%
Megyn Kelly
44%
J.B. Pritzker
55%
Jon Ossoff
56%
Elizabeth Warren
62%
Adam Schiff
55%
Stephen Colbert
48%
Ilhan Omar
68%
Jimmy Kimmel
57%
$52,013 Vol.
Abdul El-Sayed
$1,489 Vol.
89%
Kathy Hochul
$1,972 Vol.
70%
Mark Carney
$3,053 Vol.
83%
Hillary Clinton
$1,902 Vol.
61%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,505 Vol.
57%
Tucker Carlson
$2,343 Vol.
67%
Norah O'Donnell
$52 Vol.
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$140 Vol.
49%
Letitia James
$484 Vol.
43%
Andy Burnham
$2,764 Vol.
32%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,469 Vol.
33%
Friedrich Merz
$1,856 Vol.
27%
Elon Musk
$63 Vol.
26%
Candace Owens
$1,884 Vol.
23%
Jerome Powell
$1,394 Vol.
20%
Emmanuel Macron
$3,798 Vol.
15%
Alex Jones
$143 Vol.
26%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,211 Vol.
10%
Kevin Warsh
$4,635 Vol.
8%
Melania Trump
$95 Vol.
11%
Mohammed bin Salman
$408 Vol.
6%
Pam Bondi
$250 Vol.
6%
Papa Leone XIV
$1,063 Vol.
5%
Xi Jinping
$445 Vol.
4%
Vladimir Putin
$2,249 Vol.
4%
J.D. Vance
$1,500 Vol.
21%
Karoline Leavitt
$272 Vol.
3%
Megyn Kelly
$377 Vol.
44%
J.B. Pritzker
$264 Vol.
55%
Jon Ossoff
$103 Vol.
56%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Vol.
62%
Adam Schiff
$61 Vol.
55%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Vol.
48%
Ilhan Omar
$240 Vol.
68%
Jimmy Kimmel
$879 Vol.
57%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's recent public statements have featured pointed criticisms of journalists and political figures, including Truth Social posts on September 9 attacking CNN's Kaitlan Collins as a "3rd rate anchor" and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman as "unattractive both inside and out" while dismissing their reporting. He separately targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a rally, urging her to "get the HELL out of our country" and labeling her a "con." These fit a documented pattern of remarks aimed at media outlets, female reporters, and opponents amid coverage of the ongoing U.S.-Iran military conflict, munitions issues, and Republican events. With the September 30 resolution window now under three weeks, trader focus centers on the frequency of Truth Social activity, scheduled rallies or conventions, and any escalation in disputes with press or lawmakers that could produce additional named attacks.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercato aperto: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Volume
$52,013Data di fine
30 set 2026Mercato aperto
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRisolutore
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's recent public statements have featured pointed criticisms of journalists and political figures, including Truth Social posts on September 9 attacking CNN's Kaitlan Collins as a "3rd rate anchor" and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman as "unattractive both inside and out" while dismissing their reporting. He separately targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a rally, urging her to "get the HELL out of our country" and labeling her a "con." These fit a documented pattern of remarks aimed at media outlets, female reporters, and opponents amid coverage of the ongoing U.S.-Iran military conflict, munitions issues, and Republican events. With the September 30 resolution window now under three weeks, trader focus centers on the frequency of Truth Social activity, scheduled rallies or conventions, and any escalation in disputes with press or lawmakers that could produce additional named attacks.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$52,013Data di fine
30 set 2026Mercato aperto
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRisolutore
0x65070BE91...Trump's recent public statements have featured pointed criticisms of journalists and political figures, including Truth Social posts on September 9 attacking CNN's Kaitlan Collins as a "3rd rate anchor" and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman as "unattractive both inside and out" while dismissing their reporting. He separately targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a rally, urging her to "get the HELL out of our country" and labeling her a "con." These fit a documented pattern of remarks aimed at media outlets, female reporters, and opponents amid coverage of the ongoing U.S.-Iran military conflict, munitions issues, and Republican events. With the September 30 resolution window now under three weeks, trader focus centers on the frequency of Truth Social activity, scheduled rallies or conventions, and any escalation in disputes with press or lawmakers that could produce additional named attacks.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti