Traders assign Alibaba the highest implied probability at 31.5% for third place on the Code Arena WebDev leaderboard by end of October, followed by Moonshot at 25.5%, while OpenAI and Anthropic sit much lower. Recent leaderboard updates show OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 models dominating top spots after early-September releases, leaving room for cost-effective Chinese alternatives. Alibaba’s Qwen3 series and Moonshot’s Kimi K3 demonstrate competitive agentic coding performance, long-context handling, and strong price-performance ratios that appeal in real-world web development workflows. These dynamics reflect trader focus on sustained momentum in multi-step reasoning benchmarks and potential further model updates before the resolution window closes.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於Alibaba 32%
Moonshot 26%
OpenAI 6.3%
Anthropic 5.5%
$36,694 交易量
$36,694 交易量

Alibaba
32%

Moonshot
26%

OpenAI
6%

Anthropic
5%

SpaceXAI
5%

4%

Meta
3%

Z.ai
2%

Mistral
2%

Thinky
2%

DeepSeek
1%

ByteDance
1%

Tencent
1%

MiniMax
<1%

Xiaomi
<1%

Poolside
<1%
Alibaba 32%
Moonshot 26%
OpenAI 6.3%
Anthropic 5.5%
$36,694 交易量
$36,694 交易量

Alibaba
32%

Moonshot
26%

OpenAI
6%

Anthropic
5%

SpaceXAI
5%

4%

Meta
3%

Z.ai
2%

Mistral
2%

Thinky
2%

DeepSeek
1%

ByteDance
1%

Tencent
1%

MiniMax
<1%

Xiaomi
<1%

Poolside
<1%
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
市場開放時間: Aug 12, 2026, 8:01 PM ET
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Traders assign Alibaba the highest implied probability at 31.5% for third place on the Code Arena WebDev leaderboard by end of October, followed by Moonshot at 25.5%, while OpenAI and Anthropic sit much lower. Recent leaderboard updates show OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 models dominating top spots after early-September releases, leaving room for cost-effective Chinese alternatives. Alibaba’s Qwen3 series and Moonshot’s Kimi K3 demonstrate competitive agentic coding performance, long-context handling, and strong price-performance ratios that appeal in real-world web development workflows. These dynamics reflect trader focus on sustained momentum in multi-step reasoning benchmarks and potential further model updates before the resolution window closes.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions