Trump's recent public statements have featured pointed criticisms of journalists and political figures, including Truth Social posts on September 9 attacking CNN's Kaitlan Collins as a "3rd rate anchor" and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman as "unattractive both inside and out" while dismissing their reporting. He separately targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a rally, urging her to "get the HELL out of our country" and labeling her a "con." These fit a documented pattern of remarks aimed at media outlets, female reporters, and opponents amid coverage of the ongoing U.S.-Iran military conflict, munitions issues, and Republican events. With the September 30 resolution window now under three weeks, trader focus centers on the frequency of Truth Social activity, scheduled rallies or conventions, and any escalation in disputes with press or lawmakers that could produce additional named attacks.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено$52,013 Обс.
Sep 30, 2026
Abdul El-Sayed
88%
Kathy Hochul
71%
Mark Carney
83%
Hillary Clinton
61%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
57%
Tucker Carlson
66%
Norah O'Donnell
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
49%
Letitia James
43%
Andy Burnham
32%
Zohran Mamdani
32%
Friedrich Merz
27%
Elon Musk
26%
Candace Owens
24%
Jerome Powell
20%
Emmanuel Macron
15%
Alex Jones
26%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Kevin Warsh
8%
Melania Trump
11%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Pam Bondi
6%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Xi Jinping
4%
Vladimir Putin
4%
J.D. Vance
21%
Karoline Leavitt
3%
Megyn Kelly
44%
J.B. Pritzker
55%
Jon Ossoff
57%
Elizabeth Warren
62%
Adam Schiff
55%
Stephen Colbert
48%
Ilhan Omar
68%
Jimmy Kimmel
57%
$52,013 Обс.
Abdul El-Sayed
$1,489 Обс.
88%
Kathy Hochul
$1,972 Обс.
71%
Mark Carney
$3,053 Обс.
83%
Hillary Clinton
$1,902 Обс.
61%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,505 Обс.
57%
Tucker Carlson
$2,343 Обс.
66%
Norah O'Donnell
$52 Обс.
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$140 Обс.
49%
Letitia James
$484 Обс.
43%
Andy Burnham
$2,764 Обс.
32%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,469 Обс.
32%
Friedrich Merz
$1,856 Обс.
27%
Elon Musk
$63 Обс.
26%
Candace Owens
$1,884 Обс.
24%
Jerome Powell
$1,394 Обс.
20%
Emmanuel Macron
$3,798 Обс.
15%
Alex Jones
$143 Обс.
26%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,211 Обс.
10%
Kevin Warsh
$4,635 Обс.
8%
Melania Trump
$95 Обс.
11%
Mohammed bin Salman
$408 Обс.
6%
Pam Bondi
$250 Обс.
6%
Pope Leo XIV
$1,063 Обс.
5%
Xi Jinping
$445 Обс.
4%
Vladimir Putin
$2,249 Обс.
4%
J.D. Vance
$1,500 Обс.
21%
Karoline Leavitt
$272 Обс.
3%
Megyn Kelly
$377 Обс.
44%
J.B. Pritzker
$264 Обс.
55%
Jon Ossoff
$103 Обс.
57%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Обс.
62%
Adam Schiff
$61 Обс.
55%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Обс.
48%
Ilhan Omar
$240 Обс.
68%
Jimmy Kimmel
$879 Обс.
57%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's recent public statements have featured pointed criticisms of journalists and political figures, including Truth Social posts on September 9 attacking CNN's Kaitlan Collins as a "3rd rate anchor" and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman as "unattractive both inside and out" while dismissing their reporting. He separately targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a rally, urging her to "get the HELL out of our country" and labeling her a "con." These fit a documented pattern of remarks aimed at media outlets, female reporters, and opponents amid coverage of the ongoing U.S.-Iran military conflict, munitions issues, and Republican events. With the September 30 resolution window now under three weeks, trader focus centers on the frequency of Truth Social activity, scheduled rallies or conventions, and any escalation in disputes with press or lawmakers that could produce additional named attacks.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Ринок відкрито: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Обсяг
$52,013Дата завершення
Sep 30, 2026Ринок відкрито
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETВирішувач
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's recent public statements have featured pointed criticisms of journalists and political figures, including Truth Social posts on September 9 attacking CNN's Kaitlan Collins as a "3rd rate anchor" and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman as "unattractive both inside and out" while dismissing their reporting. He separately targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a rally, urging her to "get the HELL out of our country" and labeling her a "con." These fit a documented pattern of remarks aimed at media outlets, female reporters, and opponents amid coverage of the ongoing U.S.-Iran military conflict, munitions issues, and Republican events. With the September 30 resolution window now under three weeks, trader focus centers on the frequency of Truth Social activity, scheduled rallies or conventions, and any escalation in disputes with press or lawmakers that could produce additional named attacks.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Обсяг
$52,013Дата завершення
Sep 30, 2026Ринок відкрито
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETВирішувач
0x65070BE91...Trump's recent public statements have featured pointed criticisms of journalists and political figures, including Truth Social posts on September 9 attacking CNN's Kaitlan Collins as a "3rd rate anchor" and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman as "unattractive both inside and out" while dismissing their reporting. He separately targeted Rep. Ilhan Omar at a rally, urging her to "get the HELL out of our country" and labeling her a "con." These fit a documented pattern of remarks aimed at media outlets, female reporters, and opponents amid coverage of the ongoing U.S.-Iran military conflict, munitions issues, and Republican events. With the September 30 resolution window now under three weeks, trader focus centers on the frequency of Truth Social activity, scheduled rallies or conventions, and any escalation in disputes with press or lawmakers that could produce additional named attacks.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання