Ongoing diplomatic tensions between the Trump administration and Brazilian President Lula da Silva center on stalled approval of the U.S. ambassador nominee and reciprocal visa actions, yet U.S. officials have repeatedly distinguished visa revocations from formal expulsion measures such as persona non grata declarations. The August revocation of Brazilian Ambassador Maria Luiza Ribeiro Viotti’s visa was framed as reversible upon accreditation progress and explicitly not equivalent to requiring departure, aligning with the market’s narrow definition of expulsion. With only ten days remaining before the September 30 resolution deadline and scheduled G20 tariff talks in Milwaukee, trader consensus reflects the absence of recent escalatory steps and the preference for negotiated de-escalation over abrupt diplomatic rupture. A sudden crisis or breakdown in bilateral channels could still shift probabilities before the cutoff.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · ActualizadoSí
2% probabilidad
NUEVO
NUEVO
30 sep 2026
Sí
2% probabilidad
NUEVO
NUEVO
30 sep 2026
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States expels a Brazilian diplomat stationed in the United States between market creation and September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
For the purposes of this market, “expel” refers to a formal action by the United States requiring the Brazilian diplomat to leave the United States, including a declaration of persona non grata. Revocation of a diplomat’s visa or denial of entry to the United States will not alone suffice.
An announcement of a qualifying expulsion will suffice for a “Yes” resolution, regardless of whether the relevant diplomat actually leaves the country.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the United States government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Ongoing diplomatic tensions between the Trump administration and Brazilian President Lula da Silva center on stalled approval of the U.S. ambassador nominee and reciprocal visa actions, yet U.S. officials have repeatedly distinguished visa revocations from formal expulsion measures such as persona non grata declarations. The August revocation of Brazilian Ambassador Maria Luiza Ribeiro Viotti’s visa was framed as reversible upon accreditation progress and explicitly not equivalent to requiring departure, aligning with the market’s narrow definition of expulsion. With only ten days remaining before the September 30 resolution deadline and scheduled G20 tariff talks in Milwaukee, trader consensus reflects the absence of recent escalatory steps and the preference for negotiated de-escalation over abrupt diplomatic rupture. A sudden crisis or breakdown in bilateral channels could still shift probabilities before the cutoff.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States expels a Brazilian diplomat stationed in the United States between market creation and September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
For the purposes of this market, “expel” refers to a formal action by the United States requiring the Brazilian diplomat to leave the United States, including a declaration of persona non grata. Revocation of a diplomat’s visa or denial of entry to the United States will not alone suffice.
An announcement of a qualifying expulsion will suffice for a “Yes” resolution, regardless of whether the relevant diplomat actually leaves the country.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the United States government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
For the purposes of this market, “expel” refers to a formal action by the United States requiring the Brazilian diplomat to leave the United States, including a declaration of persona non grata. Revocation of a diplomat’s visa or denial of entry to the United States will not alone suffice.
An announcement of a qualifying expulsion will suffice for a “Yes” resolution, regardless of whether the relevant diplomat actually leaves the country.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the United States government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercado abierto: Aug 11, 2026, 8:29 AM ET
Volumen
$3,158Fecha de finalización
1 oct 2026Mercado abierto
Aug 11, 2026, 8:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States expels a Brazilian diplomat stationed in the United States between market creation and September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
For the purposes of this market, “expel” refers to a formal action by the United States requiring the Brazilian diplomat to leave the United States, including a declaration of persona non grata. Revocation of a diplomat’s visa or denial of entry to the United States will not alone suffice.
An announcement of a qualifying expulsion will suffice for a “Yes” resolution, regardless of whether the relevant diplomat actually leaves the country.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the United States government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Ongoing diplomatic tensions between the Trump administration and Brazilian President Lula da Silva center on stalled approval of the U.S. ambassador nominee and reciprocal visa actions, yet U.S. officials have repeatedly distinguished visa revocations from formal expulsion measures such as persona non grata declarations. The August revocation of Brazilian Ambassador Maria Luiza Ribeiro Viotti’s visa was framed as reversible upon accreditation progress and explicitly not equivalent to requiring departure, aligning with the market’s narrow definition of expulsion. With only ten days remaining before the September 30 resolution deadline and scheduled G20 tariff talks in Milwaukee, trader consensus reflects the absence of recent escalatory steps and the preference for negotiated de-escalation over abrupt diplomatic rupture. A sudden crisis or breakdown in bilateral channels could still shift probabilities before the cutoff.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States expels a Brazilian diplomat stationed in the United States between market creation and September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
For the purposes of this market, “expel” refers to a formal action by the United States requiring the Brazilian diplomat to leave the United States, including a declaration of persona non grata. Revocation of a diplomat’s visa or denial of entry to the United States will not alone suffice.
An announcement of a qualifying expulsion will suffice for a “Yes” resolution, regardless of whether the relevant diplomat actually leaves the country.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the United States government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
For the purposes of this market, “expel” refers to a formal action by the United States requiring the Brazilian diplomat to leave the United States, including a declaration of persona non grata. Revocation of a diplomat’s visa or denial of entry to the United States will not alone suffice.
An announcement of a qualifying expulsion will suffice for a “Yes” resolution, regardless of whether the relevant diplomat actually leaves the country.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the United States government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Volumen
$3,158Fecha de finalización
1 oct 2026Mercado abierto
Aug 11, 2026, 8:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Ongoing diplomatic tensions between the Trump administration and Brazilian President Lula da Silva center on stalled approval of the U.S. ambassador nominee and reciprocal visa actions, yet U.S. officials have repeatedly distinguished visa revocations from formal expulsion measures such as persona non grata declarations. The August revocation of Brazilian Ambassador Maria Luiza Ribeiro Viotti’s visa was framed as reversible upon accreditation progress and explicitly not equivalent to requiring departure, aligning with the market’s narrow definition of expulsion. With only ten days remaining before the September 30 resolution deadline and scheduled G20 tariff talks in Milwaukee, trader consensus reflects the absence of recent escalatory steps and the preference for negotiated de-escalation over abrupt diplomatic rupture. A sudden crisis or breakdown in bilateral channels could still shift probabilities before the cutoff.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes