President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
Tóm tắt AI thử nghiệm tham chiếu dữ liệu Polymarket. Đây không phải tư vấn giao dịch và không ảnh hưởng đến cách thị trường này được giải quyết. · Cập nhật$52,183 KL.
Sep 30, 2026
Abdul El-Sayed
90%
Kathy Hochul
70%
Mark Carney
83%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
60%
Tucker Carlson
65%
Norah O'Donnell
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
49%
Letitia James
43%
Hillary Clinton
60%
Andy Burnham
32%
Zohran Mamdani
33%
Friedrich Merz
27%
Elon Musk
26%
Candace Owens
24%
Jerome Powell
20%
Emmanuel Macron
16%
Alex Jones
25%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Kevin Warsh
8%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Melania Trump
11%
Pam Bondi
6%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Xi Jinping
4%
Vladimir Putin
4%
J.D. Vance
20%
Karoline Leavitt
3%
Megyn Kelly
45%
J.B. Pritzker
55%
Jon Ossoff
56%
Elizabeth Warren
61%
Adam Schiff
55%
Stephen Colbert
48%
Ilhan Omar
68%
Jimmy Kimmel
57%
$52,183 KL.
Abdul El-Sayed
$1,489 KL.
90%
Kathy Hochul
$1,972 KL.
70%
Mark Carney
$3,053 KL.
83%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,505 KL.
60%
Tucker Carlson
$2,343 KL.
65%
Norah O'Donnell
$52 KL.
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$140 KL.
49%
Letitia James
$484 KL.
43%
Hillary Clinton
$1,902 KL.
60%
Andy Burnham
$2,764 KL.
32%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,469 KL.
33%
Friedrich Merz
$1,856 KL.
27%
Elon Musk
$63 KL.
26%
Candace Owens
$2,014 KL.
24%
Jerome Powell
$1,394 KL.
20%
Emmanuel Macron
$3,838 KL.
16%
Alex Jones
$143 KL.
25%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,211 KL.
10%
Kevin Warsh
$4,635 KL.
8%
Mohammed bin Salman
$408 KL.
6%
Melania Trump
$95 KL.
11%
Pam Bondi
$250 KL.
6%
Pope Leo XIV
$1,063 KL.
5%
Xi Jinping
$445 KL.
4%
Vladimir Putin
$2,249 KL.
4%
J.D. Vance
$1,500 KL.
20%
Karoline Leavitt
$272 KL.
3%
Megyn Kelly
$377 KL.
45%
J.B. Pritzker
$264 KL.
55%
Jon Ossoff
$103 KL.
56%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 KL.
61%
Adam Schiff
$61 KL.
55%
Stephen Colbert
$321 KL.
48%
Ilhan Omar
$240 KL.
68%
Jimmy Kimmel
$879 KL.
57%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Thị trường mở: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Khối lượng
$52,183Ngày kết thúc
Sep 30, 2026Thị trường mở
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETNgười giải quyết
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Khối lượng
$52,183Ngày kết thúc
Sep 30, 2026Thị trường mở
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETNgười giải quyết
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
Tóm tắt AI thử nghiệm tham chiếu dữ liệu Polymarket. Đây không phải tư vấn giao dịch và không ảnh hưởng đến cách thị trường này được giải quyết. · Cập nhật
Cẩn thận với liên kết bên ngoài.
Cẩn thận với liên kết bên ngoài.
Câu hỏi thường gặp