Trump’s recent escalation against media outlets, including his September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage, has reinforced his established pattern of public rebukes toward journalists and political opponents. On September 18 he directly told Bloomberg correspondent Catherine Lucey she was “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange defending the restrictions, continuing a series of pointed remarks aimed at female reporters and outlets in recent weeks. With the September 30 resolution window approaching, traders weigh the likelihood of further named attacks on media figures or rivals based on Trump’s documented record of social media posts, rally comments, and press interactions that meet the market’s criteria for personal or professional insults.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano$137,282 Wol.
Sep 30, 2026
Mark Carney
75%
Jon Ossoff
74%
Tucker Carlson
66%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
61%
Zohran Mamdani
30%
Elon Musk
41%
Friedrich Merz
27%
Letitia James
38%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
34%
Andy Burnham
35%
Candace Owens
31%
Emmanuel Macron
14%
Jerome Powell
13%
Pam Bondi
10%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Norah O'Donnell
7%
Stephen Colbert
28%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Pope Leo XIV
6%
Kevin Warsh
6%
Melania Trump
5%
Xi Jinping
4%
J.D. Vance
4%
Vladimir Putin
3%
Karoline Leavitt
2%
Megyn Kelly
43%
Alex Jones
50%
Jimmy Kimmel
54%
Kathy Hochul
41%
Ilhan Omar
59%
Hillary Clinton
55%
Elizabeth Warren
51%
Adam Schiff
49%
$137,282 Wol.
Mark Carney
$4,997 Wol.
75%
Jon Ossoff
$123 Wol.
74%
Tucker Carlson
$3,227 Wol.
66%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$249 Wol.
61%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,510 Wol.
30%
Elon Musk
$170 Wol.
41%
Friedrich Merz
$2,496 Wol.
27%
Letitia James
$747 Wol.
38%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,525 Wol.
34%
Andy Burnham
$3,715 Wol.
35%
Candace Owens
$3,097 Wol.
31%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,523 Wol.
14%
Jerome Powell
$2,136 Wol.
13%
Pam Bondi
$263 Wol.
10%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,642 Wol.
10%
Norah O'Donnell
$72 Wol.
7%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Wol.
28%
Mohammed bin Salman
$440 Wol.
6%
Pope Leo XIV
$1,386 Wol.
6%
Kevin Warsh
$77,427 Wol.
6%
Melania Trump
$101 Wol.
5%
Xi Jinping
$2,169 Wol.
4%
J.D. Vance
$1,542 Wol.
4%
Vladimir Putin
$2,695 Wol.
3%
Karoline Leavitt
$300 Wol.
2%
Megyn Kelly
$407 Wol.
43%
Alex Jones
$204 Wol.
50%
Jimmy Kimmel
$923 Wol.
54%
Kathy Hochul
$2,198 Wol.
41%
Ilhan Omar
$419 Wol.
59%
Hillary Clinton
$1,985 Wol.
55%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Wol.
51%
Adam Schiff
$61 Wol.
49%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s recent escalation against media outlets, including his September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage, has reinforced his established pattern of public rebukes toward journalists and political opponents. On September 18 he directly told Bloomberg correspondent Catherine Lucey she was “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange defending the restrictions, continuing a series of pointed remarks aimed at female reporters and outlets in recent weeks. With the September 30 resolution window approaching, traders weigh the likelihood of further named attacks on media figures or rivals based on Trump’s documented record of social media posts, rally comments, and press interactions that meet the market’s criteria for personal or professional insults.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Rynek otwarty: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Wolumen
$137,282Data zakończenia
Sep 30, 2026Rynek otwarty
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s recent escalation against media outlets, including his September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage, has reinforced his established pattern of public rebukes toward journalists and political opponents. On September 18 he directly told Bloomberg correspondent Catherine Lucey she was “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange defending the restrictions, continuing a series of pointed remarks aimed at female reporters and outlets in recent weeks. With the September 30 resolution window approaching, traders weigh the likelihood of further named attacks on media figures or rivals based on Trump’s documented record of social media posts, rally comments, and press interactions that meet the market’s criteria for personal or professional insults.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Wolumen
$137,282Data zakończenia
Sep 30, 2026Rynek otwarty
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x65070BE91...Trump’s recent escalation against media outlets, including his September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage, has reinforced his established pattern of public rebukes toward journalists and political opponents. On September 18 he directly told Bloomberg correspondent Catherine Lucey she was “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange defending the restrictions, continuing a series of pointed remarks aimed at female reporters and outlets in recent weeks. With the September 30 resolution window approaching, traders weigh the likelihood of further named attacks on media figures or rivals based on Trump’s documented record of social media posts, rally comments, and press interactions that meet the market’s criteria for personal or professional insults.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania