President Donald Trump’s recent public criticism of journalists and news organizations has shaped trader views on this market, with high implied probabilities attached to several media figures and political rivals. In mid-September, Trump announced bans on CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House over what he called “fake news” coverage, directly calling Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange and labeling outlets such as The New York Times and Washington Post as “disgusting” and “crummy.” Ongoing tensions with Iran, midterm election pressures, and friction with the Federal Reserve and courts have coincided with these statements. With only days remaining until September 30, scheduled events including the UN General Assembly and continued press interactions could prompt additional remarks. Traders weigh these patterns against historical tendencies for personal attacks in public settings.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jour$139,892 Vol.
30 sept. 2026
Mark Carney
84%
Jon Ossoff
77%
Tucker Carlson
71%
Elon Musk
41%
Zohran Mamdani
29%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
27%
Friedrich Merz
22%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
34%
Andy Burnham
33%
Candace Owens
33%
Emmanuel Macron
14%
Jerome Powell
11%
Pam Bondi
11%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Norah O'Donnell
8%
Stephen Colbert
28%
Mohammed ben Salmane
6%
Pape Léon XIV
6%
Melania Trump
5%
Kevin Warsh
4%
Xi Jinping
3%
Vladimir Poutine
3%
Karoline Leavitt
2%
J.D. Vance
2%
Megyn Kelly
47%
Alex Jones
46%
Jimmy Kimmel
57%
Kathy Hochul
46%
Ilhan Omar
62%
Letitia James
61%
Hillary Clinton
58%
Elizabeth Warren
51%
Adam Schiff
51%
$139,892 Vol.
Mark Carney
$5,456 Vol.
84%
Jon Ossoff
$123 Vol.
77%
Tucker Carlson
$3,233 Vol.
71%
Elon Musk
$170 Vol.
41%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,510 Vol.
29%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$249 Vol.
27%
Friedrich Merz
$2,993 Vol.
22%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,525 Vol.
34%
Andy Burnham
$3,715 Vol.
33%
Candace Owens
$3,097 Vol.
33%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,523 Vol.
14%
Jerome Powell
$2,136 Vol.
11%
Pam Bondi
$263 Vol.
11%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,642 Vol.
10%
Norah O'Donnell
$72 Vol.
8%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Vol.
28%
Mohammed ben Salmane
$440 Vol.
6%
Pape Léon XIV
$1,386 Vol.
6%
Melania Trump
$101 Vol.
5%
Kevin Warsh
$78,842 Vol.
4%
Xi Jinping
$2,189 Vol.
3%
Vladimir Poutine
$2,778 Vol.
3%
Karoline Leavitt
$300 Vol.
2%
J.D. Vance
$1,542 Vol.
2%
Megyn Kelly
$407 Vol.
47%
Alex Jones
$204 Vol.
46%
Jimmy Kimmel
$923 Vol.
57%
Kathy Hochul
$2,309 Vol.
46%
Ilhan Omar
$419 Vol.
62%
Letitia James
$767 Vol.
61%
Hillary Clinton
$1,985 Vol.
58%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Vol.
51%
Adam Schiff
$61 Vol.
51%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s recent public criticism of journalists and news organizations has shaped trader views on this market, with high implied probabilities attached to several media figures and political rivals. In mid-September, Trump announced bans on CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House over what he called “fake news” coverage, directly calling Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange and labeling outlets such as The New York Times and Washington Post as “disgusting” and “crummy.” Ongoing tensions with Iran, midterm election pressures, and friction with the Federal Reserve and courts have coincided with these statements. With only days remaining until September 30, scheduled events including the UN General Assembly and continued press interactions could prompt additional remarks. Traders weigh these patterns against historical tendencies for personal attacks in public settings.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Marché ouvert : Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Volume
$139,892Date de fin
30 sept. 2026Marché ouvert
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRésolveur
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s recent public criticism of journalists and news organizations has shaped trader views on this market, with high implied probabilities attached to several media figures and political rivals. In mid-September, Trump announced bans on CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House over what he called “fake news” coverage, directly calling Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange and labeling outlets such as The New York Times and Washington Post as “disgusting” and “crummy.” Ongoing tensions with Iran, midterm election pressures, and friction with the Federal Reserve and courts have coincided with these statements. With only days remaining until September 30, scheduled events including the UN General Assembly and continued press interactions could prompt additional remarks. Traders weigh these patterns against historical tendencies for personal attacks in public settings.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$139,892Date de fin
30 sept. 2026Marché ouvert
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRésolveur
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump’s recent public criticism of journalists and news organizations has shaped trader views on this market, with high implied probabilities attached to several media figures and political rivals. In mid-September, Trump announced bans on CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House over what he called “fake news” coverage, directly calling Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey “terrible” during an Oval Office exchange and labeling outlets such as The New York Times and Washington Post as “disgusting” and “crummy.” Ongoing tensions with Iran, midterm election pressures, and friction with the Federal Reserve and courts have coincided with these statements. With only days remaining until September 30, scheduled events including the UN General Assembly and continued press interactions could prompt additional remarks. Traders weigh these patterns against historical tendencies for personal attacks in public settings.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes