Ukraine's rejection of strict limits on its armed forces remains a core red line in ongoing Russia peace talks, with officials including President Zelensky and military leaders consistently framing any fixed ceiling below current wartime levels as unacceptable for self-defense. Negotiations in late 2025 produced drafts referencing an 800,000-person peacetime cap as a compromise, yet revised U.S. proposals softened or removed explicit limiting language amid Ukrainian pushback, and no binding agreement has advanced. As of September 2026, active diplomacy involving U.S. envoys focuses on territory, security guarantees, and ceasefires rather than force reductions, while Ukraine sustains high mobilization rates and emphasizes sovereign flexibility against renewed aggression. Traders price the "No" outcome near certainty because structural security requirements and stalled talks make a pre-2027 limit improbable absent major concessions.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jourOui
$116,053 Vol.
$116,053 Vol.
Oui
$116,053 Vol.
$116,053 Vol.
An official pledge by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces will qualify for a “Yes” resolution whether as a unilateral announcement or part of an agreement with the Russian Federation.
A qualifying agreement must include a commitment by Ukraine to limit the total number of personnel in its armed forces. This includes any specific numerical cap on the number of personnel Ukraine may have in its armed forces, or any proportional limit on Ukrainian armed forces personnel (e.g., a commitment to reduce the size of the armed forces by a percentage of its current size). Limits on the number of personnel in specific branches of the Ukrainian armed forces will not count.
Other limits on Ukrainian military powers, such as the relinquishment of long-range weapons or limits on other categories of armaments or military capabilities, that do not constrain the total number of personnel in Ukraine’s armed forces, will not qualify.
An agreement by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces as a precondition of a more comprehensive peace process or deal will qualify, even if the agreement is not yet finalized or part of a formalized peace deal. The September 8, 1995 “Agreed Basic Principles” between Bosnia and Yugoslavia which recognized the borders and sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was later formalized through the Dayton Peace Agreement is an example of a qualifying agreement.
Any agreement or pledge made before the resolution date of this market will qualify, regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming a qualifying agreement has been made will also qualify.
Marché ouvert : Nov 20, 2025, 6:10 PM ET
Résolveur
0x65070BE91...An official pledge by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces will qualify for a “Yes” resolution whether as a unilateral announcement or part of an agreement with the Russian Federation.
A qualifying agreement must include a commitment by Ukraine to limit the total number of personnel in its armed forces. This includes any specific numerical cap on the number of personnel Ukraine may have in its armed forces, or any proportional limit on Ukrainian armed forces personnel (e.g., a commitment to reduce the size of the armed forces by a percentage of its current size). Limits on the number of personnel in specific branches of the Ukrainian armed forces will not count.
Other limits on Ukrainian military powers, such as the relinquishment of long-range weapons or limits on other categories of armaments or military capabilities, that do not constrain the total number of personnel in Ukraine’s armed forces, will not qualify.
An agreement by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces as a precondition of a more comprehensive peace process or deal will qualify, even if the agreement is not yet finalized or part of a formalized peace deal. The September 8, 1995 “Agreed Basic Principles” between Bosnia and Yugoslavia which recognized the borders and sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was later formalized through the Dayton Peace Agreement is an example of a qualifying agreement.
Any agreement or pledge made before the resolution date of this market will qualify, regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming a qualifying agreement has been made will also qualify.
Résolveur
0x65070BE91...Ukraine's rejection of strict limits on its armed forces remains a core red line in ongoing Russia peace talks, with officials including President Zelensky and military leaders consistently framing any fixed ceiling below current wartime levels as unacceptable for self-defense. Negotiations in late 2025 produced drafts referencing an 800,000-person peacetime cap as a compromise, yet revised U.S. proposals softened or removed explicit limiting language amid Ukrainian pushback, and no binding agreement has advanced. As of September 2026, active diplomacy involving U.S. envoys focuses on territory, security guarantees, and ceasefires rather than force reductions, while Ukraine sustains high mobilization rates and emphasizes sovereign flexibility against renewed aggression. Traders price the "No" outcome near certainty because structural security requirements and stalled talks make a pre-2027 limit improbable absent major concessions.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jour



Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes