Trump’s recent escalation of his long-standing conflict with the press, including a September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage and a direct insult to a Bloomberg reporter challenging the move, represents the dominant near-term driver of trader assessments. Additional recent comments have targeted the Kennedy Center as “a dump” and included pointed remarks about Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and presentation style. With roughly ten days remaining until the September 30 resolution date, scheduled public events such as the September 22 UN General Assembly address and ongoing press interactions around midterm messaging and economic policy could generate further statements. Traders weigh these patterns against Trump’s established record of personal criticisms during periods of institutional pushback.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · Aktualisiert$136,882 Vol.
30. Sep. 2026
Mark Carney
78%
Jon Ossoff
74%
Tucker Carlson
67%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
61%
Alex Jones
50%
Zohran Mamdani
30%
Elon Musk
41%
Letitia James
39%
Friedrich Merz
22%
Andy Burnham
33%
Candace Owens
31%
Jerome Powell
14%
Emmanuel Macron
14%
Benjamin Netanjahu
10%
Norah O'Donnell
8%
Stephen Colbert
27%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Papst Leo XIV.
6%
Kevin Warsh
6%
J.D. Vance
5%
Pam Bondi
3%
Xi Jinping
3%
Karoline Leavitt
2%
Wladimir Putin
2%
Megyn Kelly
45%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
52%
Melania Trump
32%
Jimmy Kimmel
54%
Kathy Hochul
39%
Ilhan Omar
59%
Hillary Clinton
54%
Elizabeth Warren
51%
Adam Schiff
49%
$136,882 Vol.
Mark Carney
$4,932 Vol.
78%
Jon Ossoff
$123 Vol.
74%
Tucker Carlson
$3,200 Vol.
67%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$236 Vol.
61%
Alex Jones
$204 Vol.
50%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,510 Vol.
30%
Elon Musk
$163 Vol.
41%
Letitia James
$747 Vol.
39%
Friedrich Merz
$2,214 Vol.
22%
Andy Burnham
$3,715 Vol.
33%
Candace Owens
$3,097 Vol.
31%
Jerome Powell
$2,136 Vol.
14%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,523 Vol.
14%
Benjamin Netanjahu
$1,642 Vol.
10%
Norah O'Donnell
$72 Vol.
8%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Vol.
27%
Mohammed bin Salman
$440 Vol.
6%
Papst Leo XIV.
$1,386 Vol.
6%
Kevin Warsh
$77,427 Vol.
6%
J.D. Vance
$1,542 Vol.
5%
Pam Bondi
$263 Vol.
3%
Xi Jinping
$2,169 Vol.
3%
Karoline Leavitt
$300 Vol.
2%
Wladimir Putin
$2,695 Vol.
2%
Megyn Kelly
$407 Vol.
45%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,525 Vol.
52%
Melania Trump
$101 Vol.
32%
Jimmy Kimmel
$918 Vol.
54%
Kathy Hochul
$2,198 Vol.
39%
Ilhan Omar
$419 Vol.
59%
Hillary Clinton
$1,985 Vol.
54%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Vol.
51%
Adam Schiff
$61 Vol.
49%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s recent escalation of his long-standing conflict with the press, including a September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage and a direct insult to a Bloomberg reporter challenging the move, represents the dominant near-term driver of trader assessments. Additional recent comments have targeted the Kennedy Center as “a dump” and included pointed remarks about Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and presentation style. With roughly ten days remaining until the September 30 resolution date, scheduled public events such as the September 22 UN General Assembly address and ongoing press interactions around midterm messaging and economic policy could generate further statements. Traders weigh these patterns against Trump’s established record of personal criticisms during periods of institutional pushback.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Markt eröffnet: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Volumen
$136,882Enddatum
30. Sep. 2026Markt eröffnet
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETAbwickler
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s recent escalation of his long-standing conflict with the press, including a September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage and a direct insult to a Bloomberg reporter challenging the move, represents the dominant near-term driver of trader assessments. Additional recent comments have targeted the Kennedy Center as “a dump” and included pointed remarks about Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and presentation style. With roughly ten days remaining until the September 30 resolution date, scheduled public events such as the September 22 UN General Assembly address and ongoing press interactions around midterm messaging and economic policy could generate further statements. Traders weigh these patterns against Trump’s established record of personal criticisms during periods of institutional pushback.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$136,882Enddatum
30. Sep. 2026Markt eröffnet
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETAbwickler
0x65070BE91...Trump’s recent escalation of his long-standing conflict with the press, including a September 18 announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House over “fake news” coverage and a direct insult to a Bloomberg reporter challenging the move, represents the dominant near-term driver of trader assessments. Additional recent comments have targeted the Kennedy Center as “a dump” and included pointed remarks about Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and presentation style. With roughly ten days remaining until the September 30 resolution date, scheduled public events such as the September 22 UN General Assembly address and ongoing press interactions around midterm messaging and economic policy could generate further statements. Traders weigh these patterns against Trump’s established record of personal criticisms during periods of institutional pushback.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · Aktualisiert
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Häufig gestellte Fragen