President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено$52,143 Объем
30 сент. 2026 г.
Абдул Эль-Сайед
90%
Кэти Хоукул
71%
Марк Карни
83%
Хиллари Клинтон
61%
Марджори Тейлор Грин
60%
Такер Карлсон
66%
Нора О'Доннелл
50%
Александрия Окасио-Кортес
49%
Летишия Джеймс
43%
Энди Бернхэм
32%
Зохран Мамдани
36%
Фридрих Мерц
27%
Илон Маск
26%
Кэндис Оуэнс
24%
Джером Пауэлл
20%
Эммануэль Макрон
16%
Алекс Джонс
25%
Биньямин Нетаньяху
10%
Кевин Варш
9%
Мухаммед бин Салман
6%
Мелания Трамп
11%
Пэм Бонди
6%
Папа Лев XIV
5%
Си Цзиньпин
4%
Владимир Путин
4%
Дж.Д. Ванс
21%
Каролин Левитт
3%
Мегин Келли
45%
Дж. Б. Притцкер
55%
Джон Оссофф
56%
Элизабет Уоррен
61%
Адам Шифф
55%
Стивен Колберт
48%
Илхан Омар
68%
Джимми Киммел
57%
$52,143 Объем
Абдул Эль-Сайед
$1,489 Объем
90%
Кэти Хоукул
$1,972 Объем
71%
Марк Карни
$3,053 Объем
83%
Хиллари Клинтон
$1,902 Объем
61%
Марджори Тейлор Грин
$1,505 Объем
60%
Такер Карлсон
$2,343 Объем
66%
Нора О'Доннелл
$52 Объем
50%
Александрия Окасио-Кортес
$140 Объем
49%
Летишия Джеймс
$484 Объем
43%
Энди Бернхэм
$2,764 Объем
32%
Зохран Мамдани
$2,469 Объем
36%
Фридрих Мерц
$1,856 Объем
27%
Илон Маск
$63 Объем
26%
Кэндис Оуэнс
$2,014 Объем
24%
Джером Пауэлл
$1,394 Объем
20%
Эммануэль Макрон
$3,798 Объем
16%
Алекс Джонс
$143 Объем
25%
Биньямин Нетаньяху
$1,211 Объем
10%
Кевин Варш
$4,635 Объем
9%
Мухаммед бин Салман
$408 Объем
6%
Мелания Трамп
$95 Объем
11%
Пэм Бонди
$250 Объем
6%
Папа Лев XIV
$1,063 Объем
5%
Си Цзиньпин
$445 Объем
4%
Владимир Путин
$2,249 Объем
4%
Дж.Д. Ванс
$1,500 Объем
21%
Каролин Левитт
$272 Объем
3%
Мегин Келли
$377 Объем
45%
Дж. Б. Притцкер
$264 Объем
55%
Джон Оссофф
$103 Объем
56%
Элизабет Уоррен
$457 Объем
61%
Адам Шифф
$61 Объем
55%
Стивен Колберт
$321 Объем
48%
Илхан Омар
$240 Объем
68%
Джимми Киммел
$879 Объем
57%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Открытие рынка: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Объем
$52,143Дата окончания
30 сент. 2026 г.Открытие рынка
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETКто определяет исход
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Объем
$52,143Дата окончания
30 сент. 2026 г.Открытие рынка
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETКто определяет исход
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы