President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui$52,183 Vol.
Sep 30, 2026
Abdul El-Sayed
90%
Kathy Hochul
70%
Mark Carney
83%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
60%
Tucker Carlson
65%
Norah O'Donnell
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
49%
Letitia James
43%
Hillary Clinton
60%
Andy Burnham
32%
Zohran Mamdani
33%
Friedrich Merz
27%
Elon Musk
26%
Candace Owens
24%
Jerome Powell
20%
Emmanuel Macron
16%
Alex Jones
25%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Kevin Warsh
8%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Melania Trump
11%
Pam Bondi
6%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Xi Jinping
4%
Vladimir Putin
4%
J.D. Vance
20%
Karoline Leavitt
3%
Megyn Kelly
45%
J.B. Pritzker
55%
Jon Ossoff
56%
Elizabeth Warren
61%
Adam Schiff
55%
Stephen Colbert
48%
Ilhan Omar
68%
Jimmy Kimmel
57%
$52,183 Vol.
Abdul El-Sayed
$1,489 Vol.
90%
Kathy Hochul
$1,972 Vol.
70%
Mark Carney
$3,053 Vol.
83%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,505 Vol.
60%
Tucker Carlson
$2,343 Vol.
65%
Norah O'Donnell
$52 Vol.
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$140 Vol.
49%
Letitia James
$484 Vol.
43%
Hillary Clinton
$1,902 Vol.
60%
Andy Burnham
$2,764 Vol.
32%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,469 Vol.
33%
Friedrich Merz
$1,856 Vol.
27%
Elon Musk
$63 Vol.
26%
Candace Owens
$2,014 Vol.
24%
Jerome Powell
$1,394 Vol.
20%
Emmanuel Macron
$3,838 Vol.
16%
Alex Jones
$143 Vol.
25%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,211 Vol.
10%
Kevin Warsh
$4,635 Vol.
8%
Mohammed bin Salman
$408 Vol.
6%
Melania Trump
$95 Vol.
11%
Pam Bondi
$250 Vol.
6%
Pope Leo XIV
$1,063 Vol.
5%
Xi Jinping
$445 Vol.
4%
Vladimir Putin
$2,249 Vol.
4%
J.D. Vance
$1,500 Vol.
20%
Karoline Leavitt
$272 Vol.
3%
Megyn Kelly
$377 Vol.
45%
J.B. Pritzker
$264 Vol.
55%
Jon Ossoff
$103 Vol.
56%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Vol.
61%
Adam Schiff
$61 Vol.
55%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Vol.
48%
Ilhan Omar
$240 Vol.
68%
Jimmy Kimmel
$879 Vol.
57%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Pasar Dibuka: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Volume
$52,183Tanggal Berakhir
Sep 30, 2026Pasar Dibuka
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$52,183Tanggal Berakhir
Sep 30, 2026Pasar Dibuka
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump maintains an established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists and political figures through Truth Social posts and rally remarks, with recent examples including attacks on CNN's Kaitlan Collins as "very dumb and unhappy" and the New York Times' Maggie Haberman. These statements followed coverage of his events and reporting on administration actions. As of mid-September 2026, scheduled appearances such as the Republican midterm convention in Dallas and diplomatic travel to Ireland create additional opportunities for unscripted comments. Trader assessments of likely targets by September 30 reflect this ongoing cadence of public exchanges rather than isolated incidents, with media coverage and opposition politicians frequently cited in similar past episodes.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan