**Trader consensus favoring no US-Cuba military clash in 2026 reflects the Trump administration’s emphasis on economic coercion and diplomatic signaling over direct intervention.** A maximum-pressure campaign featuring an oil blockade, secondary sanctions on military-linked entities, and expanded restrictions has strained Cuba’s economy, triggering repeated blackouts and shortages, while US surveillance flights, earlier Caribbean naval presence, and public statements have kept military options visible without triggering escalation. Recent diplomatic contacts and Cuban openness to talks on equal terms have continued amid stalled formal negotiations, and US attention has remained divided by other priorities such as Iran. Minor incidents, including a February speedboat clash with expatriates, stayed localized and did not involve US forces. With only months remaining in 2026 and no verified major military confrontation to date, these factors underpin the 84% implied probability traders assign to no clash.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · ОбновленоВоенное столкновение США и Кубы в 2026 году?
Военное столкновение США и Кубы в 2026 году?
Да
16% вероятность
$250,267 Объем
$250,267 Объем
31 дек. 2026 г.
Да
16% вероятность
$250,267 Объем
$250,267 Объем
31 дек. 2026 г.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Cuba between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Cuban military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Cuban Border Guard is considered part of the Cuban military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.**Trader consensus favoring no US-Cuba military clash in 2026 reflects the Trump administration’s emphasis on economic coercion and diplomatic signaling over direct intervention.** A maximum-pressure campaign featuring an oil blockade, secondary sanctions on military-linked entities, and expanded restrictions has strained Cuba’s economy, triggering repeated blackouts and shortages, while US surveillance flights, earlier Caribbean naval presence, and public statements have kept military options visible without triggering escalation. Recent diplomatic contacts and Cuban openness to talks on equal terms have continued amid stalled formal negotiations, and US attention has remained divided by other priorities such as Iran. Minor incidents, including a February speedboat clash with expatriates, stayed localized and did not involve US forces. With only months remaining in 2026 and no verified major military confrontation to date, these factors underpin the 84% implied probability traders assign to no clash.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Cuba between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Cuban military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Cuban Border Guard is considered part of the Cuban military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Cuban military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Cuban Border Guard is considered part of the Cuban military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Открытие рынка: Feb 25, 2026, 7:31 PM ET
Объем
$250,267Дата окончания
1 янв. 2027 г.Открытие рынка
Feb 25, 2026, 7:31 PM ETКто определяет исход
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Cuba between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Cuban military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Cuban Border Guard is considered part of the Cuban military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.**Trader consensus favoring no US-Cuba military clash in 2026 reflects the Trump administration’s emphasis on economic coercion and diplomatic signaling over direct intervention.** A maximum-pressure campaign featuring an oil blockade, secondary sanctions on military-linked entities, and expanded restrictions has strained Cuba’s economy, triggering repeated blackouts and shortages, while US surveillance flights, earlier Caribbean naval presence, and public statements have kept military options visible without triggering escalation. Recent diplomatic contacts and Cuban openness to talks on equal terms have continued amid stalled formal negotiations, and US attention has remained divided by other priorities such as Iran. Minor incidents, including a February speedboat clash with expatriates, stayed localized and did not involve US forces. With only months remaining in 2026 and no verified major military confrontation to date, these factors underpin the 84% implied probability traders assign to no clash.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Cuba between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Cuban military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Cuban Border Guard is considered part of the Cuban military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Cuban military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Cuban Border Guard is considered part of the Cuban military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Объем
$250,267Дата окончания
1 янв. 2027 г.Открытие рынка
Feb 25, 2026, 7:31 PM ETКто определяет исход
0x65070BE91...**Trader consensus favoring no US-Cuba military clash in 2026 reflects the Trump administration’s emphasis on economic coercion and diplomatic signaling over direct intervention.** A maximum-pressure campaign featuring an oil blockade, secondary sanctions on military-linked entities, and expanded restrictions has strained Cuba’s economy, triggering repeated blackouts and shortages, while US surveillance flights, earlier Caribbean naval presence, and public statements have kept military options visible without triggering escalation. Recent diplomatic contacts and Cuban openness to talks on equal terms have continued amid stalled formal negotiations, and US attention has remained divided by other priorities such as Iran. Minor incidents, including a February speedboat clash with expatriates, stayed localized and did not involve US forces. With only months remaining in 2026 and no verified major military confrontation to date, these factors underpin the 84% implied probability traders assign to no clash.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы