The tightly bunched implied probabilities around 45-50% for more than two dozen grandmasters underscore the deep parity across the Titled Tuesday field, where no single player holds a decisive edge in the fast-paced online format. Gukesh Dommaraju, Ding Liren, Wei Yi, and Andrew Tang sit at the top of trader consensus alongside veterans like Vladislav Artemiev and Vladimir Fedoseev, while younger standouts such as Praggnanandhaa Rameshbabu, Alireza Firouzja, and Nodirbek Abdusattorov remain within a narrow band. This clustering stems from the event’s large entry of titled players, variable recent form across rapid and blitz time controls, and the absence of any dominant recent winner or confirmed standout preparation that would separate the group. Magnus Carlsen’s lower 14.5% and Denis Lazavik’s 19.5% highlight how participation patterns and historical results in this weekly competition continue to shape market views without creating clear separation at the top.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · AtualizadoGukesh Dommaraju 100%
Ding Liren 100%
Andrew Tang 99%
Wei Yi 98%
Gukesh Dommaraju
100%
Ding Liren
100%
Andrew Tang
99%
Wei Yi
98%
Vladimir Fedoseev
98%
Vladislav Artemiev
97%
Levon Aronian
96%
Praggnanandhaa Rameshbabu
96%
Arjun Erigaisi
95%
Dmitry Andreikin
95%
Sam Sevian
95%
Christopher Yoo
95%
Le Tuan Minh
94%
Nikolas Theodorou
94%
Pranesh Munirethinam
94%
Shamsiddin Vokhidov
94%
Alireza Firouzja
93%
Alexander Grischuk
93%
Aleksandr Shimanov
93%
Benjamin Bok
93%
Cristobal Henriquez Villagra
93%
Dau Khuong Duy
93%
Haik Martirosyan
93%
Hans Niemann
93%
Ian Nepomniachtchi
93%
Maxime Vachier-Lagrave
93%
Nodirbek Abdusattorov
93%
Nihal Sarin
93%
Oleksandr Bortnyk
93%
Pranav Venkatesh
93%
Rudik Makarian
93%
Sergey Sklokin
93%
Volen Dyulgerov
93%
Vincent Keymer
93%
Awonder Liang
93%
Sina Movahed
92%
Aleksandar Indjic
92%
Aleksei Sarana
92%
Bogdan-Daniel Deac
92%
David Anton
92%
Fabiano Caruana
92%
Faustino Oro
92%
Frederik Svane
92%
Jan-Krzysztof Duda
92%
Jose Martinez
92%
Javokhir Sindarov
92%
Jeffery Xiong
92%
Renato Terry Lujan
92%
Seyyed Mohammad Amin Tabatabaei
92%
Wesley So
92%
Yoseph Theolifus Taher
92%
Aravindh Chithambaram
91%
Dincer Tasdogen
91%
Haowen Xue
91%
Jules Moussard
91%
Matthias Bluebaum
91%
Parham Maghsoodloo
91%
Rasmus Svane
91%
Zhamsaran Tsydypov
91%
Andrey Esipenko
90%
Bardiya Daneshvar
90%
Brandon Jacobson
90%
Tuomas Turunen
90%
Denis Lazavik
48%
Hikaru Nakamura
47%
Magnus Carlsen
10%
Gukesh Dommaraju 100%
Ding Liren 100%
Andrew Tang 99%
Wei Yi 98%
Gukesh Dommaraju
100%
Ding Liren
100%
Andrew Tang
99%
Wei Yi
98%
Vladimir Fedoseev
98%
Vladislav Artemiev
97%
Levon Aronian
96%
Praggnanandhaa Rameshbabu
96%
Arjun Erigaisi
95%
Dmitry Andreikin
95%
Sam Sevian
95%
Christopher Yoo
95%
Le Tuan Minh
94%
Nikolas Theodorou
94%
Pranesh Munirethinam
94%
Shamsiddin Vokhidov
94%
Alireza Firouzja
93%
Alexander Grischuk
93%
Aleksandr Shimanov
93%
Benjamin Bok
93%
Cristobal Henriquez Villagra
93%
Dau Khuong Duy
93%
Haik Martirosyan
93%
Hans Niemann
93%
Ian Nepomniachtchi
93%
Maxime Vachier-Lagrave
93%
Nodirbek Abdusattorov
93%
Nihal Sarin
93%
Oleksandr Bortnyk
93%
Pranav Venkatesh
93%
Rudik Makarian
93%
Sergey Sklokin
93%
Volen Dyulgerov
93%
Vincent Keymer
93%
Awonder Liang
93%
Sina Movahed
92%
Aleksandar Indjic
92%
Aleksei Sarana
92%
Bogdan-Daniel Deac
92%
David Anton
92%
Fabiano Caruana
92%
Faustino Oro
92%
Frederik Svane
92%
Jan-Krzysztof Duda
92%
Jose Martinez
92%
Javokhir Sindarov
92%
Jeffery Xiong
92%
Renato Terry Lujan
92%
Seyyed Mohammad Amin Tabatabaei
92%
Wesley So
92%
Yoseph Theolifus Taher
92%
Aravindh Chithambaram
91%
Dincer Tasdogen
91%
Haowen Xue
91%
Jules Moussard
91%
Matthias Bluebaum
91%
Parham Maghsoodloo
91%
Rasmus Svane
91%
Zhamsaran Tsydypov
91%
Andrey Esipenko
90%
Bardiya Daneshvar
90%
Brandon Jacobson
90%
Tuomas Turunen
90%
Denis Lazavik
48%
Hikaru Nakamura
47%
Magnus Carlsen
10%
If the listed player does not play their corresponding market will resolve to "No".
If this tournament is postponed after October 6, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, canceled, or a winner has not been declared within this timeframe, this market will resolve to "Other."
If multiple players are declared winner, this market will resolve in favor of the player whose listed name comes first alphabetically.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the tournament organizer, Chess.com (https://www.chess.com/events/info/2026-titled-tuesday-blitz); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercado Aberto: Sep 15, 2026, 12:30 PM ET
Fonte de resolução
https://www.chess.com/events/info/2026-titled-tuesday-blitzResolver
0x69c47De9D...If the listed player does not play their corresponding market will resolve to "No".
If this tournament is postponed after October 6, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, canceled, or a winner has not been declared within this timeframe, this market will resolve to "Other."
If multiple players are declared winner, this market will resolve in favor of the player whose listed name comes first alphabetically.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the tournament organizer, Chess.com (https://www.chess.com/events/info/2026-titled-tuesday-blitz); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Fonte de resolução
https://www.chess.com/events/info/2026-titled-tuesday-blitzResolver
0x69c47De9D...The tightly bunched implied probabilities around 45-50% for more than two dozen grandmasters underscore the deep parity across the Titled Tuesday field, where no single player holds a decisive edge in the fast-paced online format. Gukesh Dommaraju, Ding Liren, Wei Yi, and Andrew Tang sit at the top of trader consensus alongside veterans like Vladislav Artemiev and Vladimir Fedoseev, while younger standouts such as Praggnanandhaa Rameshbabu, Alireza Firouzja, and Nodirbek Abdusattorov remain within a narrow band. This clustering stems from the event’s large entry of titled players, variable recent form across rapid and blitz time controls, and the absence of any dominant recent winner or confirmed standout preparation that would separate the group. Magnus Carlsen’s lower 14.5% and Denis Lazavik’s 19.5% highlight how participation patterns and historical results in this weekly competition continue to shape market views without creating clear separation at the top.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions