Constitutional barriers and judicial rulings have anchored trader expectations that President Trump will not establish direct federal administrative control over state-run elections by year-end. The Elections Clause assigns primary authority to states, with Congress holding limited power to alter rules, while executive actions face immediate legal challenges under separation of powers. Early 2026 comments from Trump on nationalizing voting prompted swift pushback from Republican congressional leaders and White House clarification linking remarks to legislation like the SAVE Act rather than unilateral takeover. Multiple federal court injunctions have blocked related executive orders on voter verification and procedures, with states pursuing further litigation. These institutional constraints, combined with limited legislative momentum ahead of midterms, sustain the 92% implied probability for no resolution to yes.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jourTrump va-t-il nationaliser les élections ?
Trump va-t-il nationaliser les élections ?
Oui
8% chance
$20,094 Vol.
$20,094 Vol.
30 déc. 2026
Oui
8% chance
$20,094 Vol.
$20,094 Vol.
30 déc. 2026
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
Constitutional barriers and judicial rulings have anchored trader expectations that President Trump will not establish direct federal administrative control over state-run elections by year-end. The Elections Clause assigns primary authority to states, with Congress holding limited power to alter rules, while executive actions face immediate legal challenges under separation of powers. Early 2026 comments from Trump on nationalizing voting prompted swift pushback from Republican congressional leaders and White House clarification linking remarks to legislation like the SAVE Act rather than unilateral takeover. Multiple federal court injunctions have blocked related executive orders on voter verification and procedures, with states pursuing further litigation. These institutional constraints, combined with limited legislative momentum ahead of midterms, sustain the 92% implied probability for no resolution to yes.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
Marché ouvert : Feb 4, 2026, 5:29 PM ET
Volume
$20,094Date de fin
31 déc. 2026Marché ouvert
Feb 4, 2026, 5:29 PM ETRésolveur
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
Constitutional barriers and judicial rulings have anchored trader expectations that President Trump will not establish direct federal administrative control over state-run elections by year-end. The Elections Clause assigns primary authority to states, with Congress holding limited power to alter rules, while executive actions face immediate legal challenges under separation of powers. Early 2026 comments from Trump on nationalizing voting prompted swift pushback from Republican congressional leaders and White House clarification linking remarks to legislation like the SAVE Act rather than unilateral takeover. Multiple federal court injunctions have blocked related executive orders on voter verification and procedures, with states pursuing further litigation. These institutional constraints, combined with limited legislative momentum ahead of midterms, sustain the 92% implied probability for no resolution to yes.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$20,094Date de fin
31 déc. 2026Marché ouvert
Feb 4, 2026, 5:29 PM ETRésolveur
0x65070BE91...Constitutional barriers and judicial rulings have anchored trader expectations that President Trump will not establish direct federal administrative control over state-run elections by year-end. The Elections Clause assigns primary authority to states, with Congress holding limited power to alter rules, while executive actions face immediate legal challenges under separation of powers. Early 2026 comments from Trump on nationalizing voting prompted swift pushback from Republican congressional leaders and White House clarification linking remarks to legislation like the SAVE Act rather than unilateral takeover. Multiple federal court injunctions have blocked related executive orders on voter verification and procedures, with states pursuing further litigation. These institutional constraints, combined with limited legislative momentum ahead of midterms, sustain the 92% implied probability for no resolution to yes.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes