Recent public endorsements from OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, xAI’s Elon Musk, and Google DeepMind’s Demis Hassabis, alongside a July 2026 employee letter signed by over 1,200 staff across frontier labs, have driven trader sentiment toward a modest edge for a 2026 joint pacing agreement. These statements emphasize embedded third-party evaluators, shared safety standards, and coordination on capability growth rates amid accelerating automated research. However, the near-even odds reflect persistent uncertainty: ongoing working-group discussions since July remain preliminary, antitrust concerns have sparked a new lawsuit alleging illegal slowdown collusion, and no formal announcement has materialized despite commitments to independent oversight. Upcoming catalysts include potential standards-body details from the labs or regulatory responses that could either solidify or stall consensus.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · ActualizadoSí
35% probabilidad
NUEVO
NUEVO
31 dic 2026
Sí
35% probabilidad
NUEVO
NUEVO
31 dic 2026
This market will resolve to "Yes" if at least two frontier AI labs announce a pacing agreement between them by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Frontier AI labs refers to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, SpaceXAI, and Meta. A pacing agreement means an agreement under which the parties commit to at least one of the following: conditioning the training, releasing, or deploying AI models on safety requirements; capping the computing power used to train AI models; limiting the rate or extent to which AI systems autonomously train or improve more capable AI systems (recursive self-improvement); or otherwise pausing or slowing the training or release of AI models.
Agreements announced before market creation will not qualify.
The labs party to the agreement must each announce it, either jointly or separately, through their official channels or through an authorized representative acting in an official capacity. Statements that reference ongoing negotiations or a prospective agreement, express support for the idea of an agreement, or otherwise do not explicitly confirm acceptance of an agreement will not qualify. An agreement that applies only to a defined class of the parties' models (e.g. frontier models or models above a capability threshold) will qualify. An agreement brokered by or including a government will qualify, provided at least two frontier AI labs are parties to it and it otherwise meets the requirements above.
If a qualifying announcement is made within this market's timeframe, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the agreement is binding, is later modified or withdrawn, or is ever implemented.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official information from the frontier AI labs; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Recent public endorsements from OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, xAI’s Elon Musk, and Google DeepMind’s Demis Hassabis, alongside a July 2026 employee letter signed by over 1,200 staff across frontier labs, have driven trader sentiment toward a modest edge for a 2026 joint pacing agreement. These statements emphasize embedded third-party evaluators, shared safety standards, and coordination on capability growth rates amid accelerating automated research. However, the near-even odds reflect persistent uncertainty: ongoing working-group discussions since July remain preliminary, antitrust concerns have sparked a new lawsuit alleging illegal slowdown collusion, and no formal announcement has materialized despite commitments to independent oversight. Upcoming catalysts include potential standards-body details from the labs or regulatory responses that could either solidify or stall consensus.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if at least two frontier AI labs announce a pacing agreement between them by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Frontier AI labs refers to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, SpaceXAI, and Meta. A pacing agreement means an agreement under which the parties commit to at least one of the following: conditioning the training, releasing, or deploying AI models on safety requirements; capping the computing power used to train AI models; limiting the rate or extent to which AI systems autonomously train or improve more capable AI systems (recursive self-improvement); or otherwise pausing or slowing the training or release of AI models.
Agreements announced before market creation will not qualify.
The labs party to the agreement must each announce it, either jointly or separately, through their official channels or through an authorized representative acting in an official capacity. Statements that reference ongoing negotiations or a prospective agreement, express support for the idea of an agreement, or otherwise do not explicitly confirm acceptance of an agreement will not qualify. An agreement that applies only to a defined class of the parties' models (e.g. frontier models or models above a capability threshold) will qualify. An agreement brokered by or including a government will qualify, provided at least two frontier AI labs are parties to it and it otherwise meets the requirements above.
If a qualifying announcement is made within this market's timeframe, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the agreement is binding, is later modified or withdrawn, or is ever implemented.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official information from the frontier AI labs; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Frontier AI labs refers to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, SpaceXAI, and Meta. A pacing agreement means an agreement under which the parties commit to at least one of the following: conditioning the training, releasing, or deploying AI models on safety requirements; capping the computing power used to train AI models; limiting the rate or extent to which AI systems autonomously train or improve more capable AI systems (recursive self-improvement); or otherwise pausing or slowing the training or release of AI models.
Agreements announced before market creation will not qualify.
The labs party to the agreement must each announce it, either jointly or separately, through their official channels or through an authorized representative acting in an official capacity. Statements that reference ongoing negotiations or a prospective agreement, express support for the idea of an agreement, or otherwise do not explicitly confirm acceptance of an agreement will not qualify. An agreement that applies only to a defined class of the parties' models (e.g. frontier models or models above a capability threshold) will qualify. An agreement brokered by or including a government will qualify, provided at least two frontier AI labs are parties to it and it otherwise meets the requirements above.
If a qualifying announcement is made within this market's timeframe, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the agreement is binding, is later modified or withdrawn, or is ever implemented.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official information from the frontier AI labs; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercado abierto: Sep 14, 2026, 8:03 PM ET
Volumen
$2,128Fecha de finalización
1 ene 2027Mercado abierto
Sep 14, 2026, 8:03 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if at least two frontier AI labs announce a pacing agreement between them by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Frontier AI labs refers to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, SpaceXAI, and Meta. A pacing agreement means an agreement under which the parties commit to at least one of the following: conditioning the training, releasing, or deploying AI models on safety requirements; capping the computing power used to train AI models; limiting the rate or extent to which AI systems autonomously train or improve more capable AI systems (recursive self-improvement); or otherwise pausing or slowing the training or release of AI models.
Agreements announced before market creation will not qualify.
The labs party to the agreement must each announce it, either jointly or separately, through their official channels or through an authorized representative acting in an official capacity. Statements that reference ongoing negotiations or a prospective agreement, express support for the idea of an agreement, or otherwise do not explicitly confirm acceptance of an agreement will not qualify. An agreement that applies only to a defined class of the parties' models (e.g. frontier models or models above a capability threshold) will qualify. An agreement brokered by or including a government will qualify, provided at least two frontier AI labs are parties to it and it otherwise meets the requirements above.
If a qualifying announcement is made within this market's timeframe, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the agreement is binding, is later modified or withdrawn, or is ever implemented.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official information from the frontier AI labs; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Recent public endorsements from OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, xAI’s Elon Musk, and Google DeepMind’s Demis Hassabis, alongside a July 2026 employee letter signed by over 1,200 staff across frontier labs, have driven trader sentiment toward a modest edge for a 2026 joint pacing agreement. These statements emphasize embedded third-party evaluators, shared safety standards, and coordination on capability growth rates amid accelerating automated research. However, the near-even odds reflect persistent uncertainty: ongoing working-group discussions since July remain preliminary, antitrust concerns have sparked a new lawsuit alleging illegal slowdown collusion, and no formal announcement has materialized despite commitments to independent oversight. Upcoming catalysts include potential standards-body details from the labs or regulatory responses that could either solidify or stall consensus.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if at least two frontier AI labs announce a pacing agreement between them by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Frontier AI labs refers to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, SpaceXAI, and Meta. A pacing agreement means an agreement under which the parties commit to at least one of the following: conditioning the training, releasing, or deploying AI models on safety requirements; capping the computing power used to train AI models; limiting the rate or extent to which AI systems autonomously train or improve more capable AI systems (recursive self-improvement); or otherwise pausing or slowing the training or release of AI models.
Agreements announced before market creation will not qualify.
The labs party to the agreement must each announce it, either jointly or separately, through their official channels or through an authorized representative acting in an official capacity. Statements that reference ongoing negotiations or a prospective agreement, express support for the idea of an agreement, or otherwise do not explicitly confirm acceptance of an agreement will not qualify. An agreement that applies only to a defined class of the parties' models (e.g. frontier models or models above a capability threshold) will qualify. An agreement brokered by or including a government will qualify, provided at least two frontier AI labs are parties to it and it otherwise meets the requirements above.
If a qualifying announcement is made within this market's timeframe, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the agreement is binding, is later modified or withdrawn, or is ever implemented.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official information from the frontier AI labs; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Frontier AI labs refers to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, SpaceXAI, and Meta. A pacing agreement means an agreement under which the parties commit to at least one of the following: conditioning the training, releasing, or deploying AI models on safety requirements; capping the computing power used to train AI models; limiting the rate or extent to which AI systems autonomously train or improve more capable AI systems (recursive self-improvement); or otherwise pausing or slowing the training or release of AI models.
Agreements announced before market creation will not qualify.
The labs party to the agreement must each announce it, either jointly or separately, through their official channels or through an authorized representative acting in an official capacity. Statements that reference ongoing negotiations or a prospective agreement, express support for the idea of an agreement, or otherwise do not explicitly confirm acceptance of an agreement will not qualify. An agreement that applies only to a defined class of the parties' models (e.g. frontier models or models above a capability threshold) will qualify. An agreement brokered by or including a government will qualify, provided at least two frontier AI labs are parties to it and it otherwise meets the requirements above.
If a qualifying announcement is made within this market's timeframe, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the agreement is binding, is later modified or withdrawn, or is ever implemented.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official information from the frontier AI labs; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Volumen
$2,128Fecha de finalización
1 ene 2027Mercado abierto
Sep 14, 2026, 8:03 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Recent public endorsements from OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, xAI’s Elon Musk, and Google DeepMind’s Demis Hassabis, alongside a July 2026 employee letter signed by over 1,200 staff across frontier labs, have driven trader sentiment toward a modest edge for a 2026 joint pacing agreement. These statements emphasize embedded third-party evaluators, shared safety standards, and coordination on capability growth rates amid accelerating automated research. However, the near-even odds reflect persistent uncertainty: ongoing working-group discussions since July remain preliminary, antitrust concerns have sparked a new lawsuit alleging illegal slowdown collusion, and no formal announcement has materialized despite commitments to independent oversight. Upcoming catalysts include potential standards-body details from the labs or regulatory responses that could either solidify or stall consensus.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes