Ukraine’s ongoing resistance to binding caps on its armed forces, combined with stalled U.S.-mediated talks, underpins the 95% trader consensus against an agreement before 2027. Recent September 2026 visits by U.S. envoys to Moscow and Kyiv produced only an agreement to resume trilateral negotiations, while Russia rejected proposals such as an air truce and reiterated demands for full control of remaining Donbas territory plus deeper military constraints. Ukrainian officials have consistently treated restrictive peacetime limits below roughly 800,000 personnel as unacceptable red lines that would undermine self-defense capacity and mobilization flexibility, especially amid continued frontline fighting and Russian recruitment drives. Earlier 2025 drafts floated 600,000–800,000 figures, yet these never advanced to a signed deal amid disagreements over territory, security guarantees, and NATO aspirations. With maximalist positions unchanged and no breakthrough imminent, traders see little prospect of formal Ukrainian acceptance of force limits in the resolution window.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · AktualisiertJa
$116,053 Vol.
$116,053 Vol.
Ja
$116,053 Vol.
$116,053 Vol.
An official pledge by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces will qualify for a “Yes” resolution whether as a unilateral announcement or part of an agreement with the Russian Federation.
A qualifying agreement must include a commitment by Ukraine to limit the total number of personnel in its armed forces. This includes any specific numerical cap on the number of personnel Ukraine may have in its armed forces, or any proportional limit on Ukrainian armed forces personnel (e.g., a commitment to reduce the size of the armed forces by a percentage of its current size). Limits on the number of personnel in specific branches of the Ukrainian armed forces will not count.
Other limits on Ukrainian military powers, such as the relinquishment of long-range weapons or limits on other categories of armaments or military capabilities, that do not constrain the total number of personnel in Ukraine’s armed forces, will not qualify.
An agreement by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces as a precondition of a more comprehensive peace process or deal will qualify, even if the agreement is not yet finalized or part of a formalized peace deal. The September 8, 1995 “Agreed Basic Principles” between Bosnia and Yugoslavia which recognized the borders and sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was later formalized through the Dayton Peace Agreement is an example of a qualifying agreement.
Any agreement or pledge made before the resolution date of this market will qualify, regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming a qualifying agreement has been made will also qualify.
Markt eröffnet: Nov 20, 2025, 6:10 PM ET
Abwickler
0x65070BE91...An official pledge by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces will qualify for a “Yes” resolution whether as a unilateral announcement or part of an agreement with the Russian Federation.
A qualifying agreement must include a commitment by Ukraine to limit the total number of personnel in its armed forces. This includes any specific numerical cap on the number of personnel Ukraine may have in its armed forces, or any proportional limit on Ukrainian armed forces personnel (e.g., a commitment to reduce the size of the armed forces by a percentage of its current size). Limits on the number of personnel in specific branches of the Ukrainian armed forces will not count.
Other limits on Ukrainian military powers, such as the relinquishment of long-range weapons or limits on other categories of armaments or military capabilities, that do not constrain the total number of personnel in Ukraine’s armed forces, will not qualify.
An agreement by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces as a precondition of a more comprehensive peace process or deal will qualify, even if the agreement is not yet finalized or part of a formalized peace deal. The September 8, 1995 “Agreed Basic Principles” between Bosnia and Yugoslavia which recognized the borders and sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was later formalized through the Dayton Peace Agreement is an example of a qualifying agreement.
Any agreement or pledge made before the resolution date of this market will qualify, regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming a qualifying agreement has been made will also qualify.
Abwickler
0x65070BE91...Ukraine’s ongoing resistance to binding caps on its armed forces, combined with stalled U.S.-mediated talks, underpins the 95% trader consensus against an agreement before 2027. Recent September 2026 visits by U.S. envoys to Moscow and Kyiv produced only an agreement to resume trilateral negotiations, while Russia rejected proposals such as an air truce and reiterated demands for full control of remaining Donbas territory plus deeper military constraints. Ukrainian officials have consistently treated restrictive peacetime limits below roughly 800,000 personnel as unacceptable red lines that would undermine self-defense capacity and mobilization flexibility, especially amid continued frontline fighting and Russian recruitment drives. Earlier 2025 drafts floated 600,000–800,000 figures, yet these never advanced to a signed deal amid disagreements over territory, security guarantees, and NATO aspirations. With maximalist positions unchanged and no breakthrough imminent, traders see little prospect of formal Ukrainian acceptance of force limits in the resolution window.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · Aktualisiert



Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Häufig gestellte Fragen